Agent Readiness Diagnostic
A team with one stuck or expensive workflow and no clear build decision.
- Named workflow, control points, and data readiness
- ROI map and a build / no-build recommendation
- A build brief your team or ours can execute
Engagements
Six ways in, sized to where you are: a single stuck workflow, an enterprise platform, or a full AI Centre of Excellence built, operated, and transferred to you. Every option ends in something running in production, not a deck.
Not sure which fits? Write two lines about the problem and we will point you at the smallest option that works.
One workflow, one owner, a direct path to production. The right entry if you are testing whether agents work for you.
A team with one stuck or expensive workflow and no clear build decision.
An operations owner with a named queue: claims, KYC, ITSM, collections, or equivalent.
Platform and compute foundations so the second, third, and tenth workflow are not greenfield projects.
Enterprises past the first workflow that want the next ones to ship faster and safer.
CIOs and platform heads facing GPU sizing, residency, and a growing inference bill.
For GCCs and enterprises building a lasting AI function, up to a full Build-Operate-Transfer CoE.
Teams with live agents or platforms that need monitoring, evaluation, and change control.
Global parents and GCC leaders standing up an India AI centre they will eventually run themselves.
The full mandate
01
A blueprint covering operating model, skills matrix, platform, and governance, then we hire the pod against it, from 8 to 30 people.
02
We run delivery, standards, and cadence until the agreed handover. The CoE ships production workflows during this phase, not after it.
03
On a date agreed up front, people, platform, and playbooks move to you. Optional fractional technical leadership stays as a thin overlay.
Transfer is in the contract from day one. You are buying a capability with a handover date, not permanent dependence on our headcount.
Every engagement starts with one email.